• Home

EMCrit RACC

Online Medical Education on Emergency Department (ED) Critical Care, Trauma, and Resuscitation

  • EDICUs
  • Show Types ▿
    • RACC-Lit
    • Mind of the Resuscitationist
    • Procedures
You are here: Home / squirts / Doubling down: ultrasound confirms central line position

Doubling down: ultrasound confirms central line position

October 30, 2016 by Josh Farkas 3 Comments

double23

I reviewed ultrasonography to confirm central line position in 2015 here, reaching these conclusions:

  • It's OK if the line tip is in the right atrium, superior vena cava, bracheocephalic vein, or subclavian vein.
  • The rapid flush test is adequate to confirm placement within a vein.
  • Line position can be confirmed ultrasonographically as shown here:

complete

My experience since then

Since 2015 this has worked fine, with one exception.  A severely obese woman underwent ultrasound-guided right subclavian central line placement.  Although the target was deep, line placement was not difficult.  The line was sutured at 15cm and a flush test demonstrated intravascular placement.  Unfortunately, later on the patient moved around and the catheter tip was pulled out of the vessel.  In retrospect, given how deep the target vessel was, the line should have been advanced further to prevent dislodgment.

Hourmozdi et al. Routine chest radiography is not necessary after ultrasound-guided right internal jugular vein catheterization.   Critical Care Medicine 2016; 44:e840.

This is a retrospective study of 1,322 ultrasound-guided right internal jugular vein catheters.  Procedures were performed at various locations within multiple centers in the Henry Ford system, mostly by trainees.

Post-procedure chest X-rays detected one pneumothorax and seventeen line “misplacements.”  Four chest X-rays were interpreted as showing a pneumothorax, but ultimately three were determined to be a false-positive (25% specificity).

Its debatable whether these “misplacements” were clinically significant.  Fifteen of the “misplaced” catheters were located in the brachiocephalic vein or subclavian vein, which is probably OK (four were used without adjustment).  One catheter was in the inferior vena cava and another was in the right ventricle – so some catheters were indeed too deep.

The authors concluded that post-procedure CXR isn't necessary.  I disagree.  My conclusion from this data is that you don't need a post-procedure CXR following right internal jugular vein central line placement, as long as:

  1. Post-procedure ultrasonography excludes pneumothorax
  2. The line isn't inserted too far (avoiding placement in the right ventricle).

Overall, this study supports the concept of ultrasonographic line confirmation in the right internal jugular vein (figure below).  Hopefully, future studies will provide evidence regarding other sites (e.g. left internal jugular, subclavian).

newprot2

Related
  • Can we use ultrasonography to confirm line position? (PulmCrit)
  • How to place a central line, also CVC show part I, part II (EMCrit)

Filed Under: EMCrit

Cite this post as:

Josh Farkas. Doubling down: ultrasound confirms central line position. EMCrit Blog. Published on October 30, 2016. Accessed on December 7th 2025. Available at [https://cmefix.emcrit.org/squirt/us-line/ ].

Financial Disclosures:

The course director, Dr. Scott D. Weingart MD FCCM, reports no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies. This episode’s speaker(s) report no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies unless listed above.

CME Review

Original Release: October 30, 2016
Date of Most Recent Review: Jul 1, 2024
Termination Date: Jul 1, 2027

You finished the 'cast,
Now Join EMCrit!

As a member, you can...

  • Get CME hours
  • Get the On Deeper Reflection Podcast
  • Support the show
  • Write it off on your taxes or get reimbursed by your department

Join Now!


.

Get the EMCrit Newsletter

If you enjoyed this post, you will almost certainly enjoy our others. Subscribe to our email list to keep informed on all of the Resuscitation and Critical Care goodness.

This Post was by the EMCrit Crew, published 9 years ago. We never spam; we hate spammers! Spammers probably work for the Joint Commission.

Comments

  1. caseyparker207 says

    October 31, 2016 at 10:11

    Hi Josh
    Great review
    I have been using US as described for a while now
    I use the subcostal window to:
    1- look for the flush
    2- check if I can see the actual catheter in the RA or RV ( ie too far)

    I’ve had a few which have made their way into the contralateral subclavian etc and noticed te flush test to show a ” delayed bubbling” – the bubbles arrive 5-10 seconds later than you’d expect

    Can we use it this way to help guard against these pitfalls?
    Casey Parker

    Reply
    • Josh Farkas says

      October 31, 2016 at 11:36

      Hi Casey,

      Thanks, I agree. My feeling is that placement in the subclavian can almost always be suspected on the basis of one or more of the following:

      (1) wire hangs up after passing it about 1/2 way into the patient
      (2) one of the ports doesn’t flush well (eg distal port)
      (3) delayed visualization of bubbles as you describe
      (4) catheter itself can be visualized in the subclavian vein

      My question is whether it matters if a line is in the subclavian. I don’t like repositioning lines as unnecessary manipulation may increase the risk of infection. Placing a new line exposes the patient to all of the risks of line placement. So my usual practice is to just use a line in the subclavian position (while avoiding infusion of pressor or caustic solutions into the distal port). It’s not 100% clear what the best thing to do here is. Would be nice to gain more clarity on this, it tends to be more relevant with subclavian lines than IJs.

      Josh

      Reply
      • Giacomo De Luca says

        March 1, 2023 at 14:09

        Have you got updates on this topic (subclavian misplacement via IJV approach) since 2016? Do you still discourage vasopressors by distal port in this case?
        I got a misplaced line recently and I can confirm that wire hanged up after passing about 1/2 way into the patient but after confirmed venous placement by intraprocedural ultrasound I tried to put the catheter in without any resistance. Each port flushed properly. X ray confirmed misplacement in omolateral subclavian

        Thank you very much and greetings from Italy

        Giacomo

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

EMCrit Join

Login

  • Lost Password
Metasin Coaching
RCM
SCRAM Bag

CME Information

See our CME Information

Other Stuff

  • Have a great idea for the next podcast? Share it here!
  • Tough Questions. Maybe you have an answer!
  • When you're done listening to the podcast,
    check out these great sites.

Who We Are

We are the EMCrit Project, a team of independent medical bloggers and podcasters joined together by our common love of cutting-edge care, iconoclastic ramblings, and FOAM.

Resus Leadership Academy

Subscribe by Email

EMCrit is a trademark of Metasin LLC. Copyright 2009-. This site represents our opinions only. See our full disclaimer, our privacy policy, commenting policy and here for credits and attribution.