• Home

EMCrit Project

Online Medical Education on Emergency Department (ED) Critical Care, Trauma, and Resuscitation

  • EDICUs
  • Show Types ▿
    • RACC-Lit
    • Mind of the Resuscitationist
    • Procedures
You are here: Home / squirts / Neurological Prognostication from the TTM Trial

Neurological Prognostication from the TTM Trial

December 7, 2013 by Scott Weingart, MD FCCM 1 Comment

Neuroprognostication from the TTM Trial

Excerpted from Life in the Fast Lane CCC

The TTM trial (Nielsen et al, 2013) used a standardized protocol for neurological prognostication to guide decisions regarding treatment withdrawal following targeted temperature management post-cardiac arrest:

All patients in the trial were actively treated until a minimum 72 hours after the intervention period, i.e. after rewarming, when neurological evaluation was done on patients not regaining consciousness.

  1. patients with myoclonus status in the first 24 hours after admission and a bilateral absence of N20-peak on median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP)
  2. patients who became brain dead due to cerebral herniation, and
  3. because of ethical reasons described below.

At that time-point, limitations in and withdrawal of therapy could be instituted by the treating physicians. The neurological evaluation was based on:

  • Clinical neurological examination (including Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), pupillary and corneal reflexes)
  • SSEP and electroencephalogram (EEG)
  • Biomarkers for brain damage were not used for operational prognostication

Findings allowing for discontinuation of active intensive care:

  • Brain death due to cerebral herniation
  • Severe myoclonus status in the first 24 hours after admission and a bilateral absence of N20-peak on median nerve SSEP
  • Minimum 72 hours after the intervention period: persisting coma with a Glasgow Motor Score 1-2 and bilateral absence of N20-peak on median nerve SSEP.
  • Minimum 72 hours after the end of the intervention period: persisting coma with a Glasgow Motor Score 1-2 and a treatment refractory status epilepticus (see TTM trial supplement for definition)

Patients with Glasgow Motor Score 1-2 at 72 hours or later who had retained N20-peak on the SSEP, or patients in hospitals where SSEP was not  available were:

  • re-examined daily
  •  the limitations/withdrawal of intensive care considered if GCS-Motor did not improve and metabolic and pharmacological affection was ruled out

Active treatment could be withdrawn prior to 72 hours after the intervention period for ethical  reasons

  • for instance: previously unknown information about disseminated end-stage cancer  or refractory shock with end-stage multiorgan failure
  • However assumptions of a poor  neurological function were not allowed be the sole reason for withdrawal of active treatment  prior to 72 h after the intervention period (exception: brain death and early myoclonus status including a negative SSEP)

Filed Under: Uncategorized


Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

EMCrit Join

Login

  • Lost Password
Metasin Coaching
RCM
SCRAM Bag

CME Information

See our CME Information

Other Stuff

  • Have a great idea for the next podcast? Share it here!
  • Tough Questions. Maybe you have an answer!
  • When you're done listening to the podcast,
    check out these great sites.

Who We Are

We are the EMCrit Project, a team of independent medical bloggers and podcasters joined together by our common love of cutting-edge care, iconoclastic ramblings, and FOAM.

Resus Leadership Academy

Subscribe by Email

EMCrit is a trademark of Metasin LLC. Copyright 2009-. This site represents our opinions only. See our full disclaimer, our privacy policy, commenting policy and here for credits and attribution.